Prediction of Jaimee Fourlis [319th] vs Madison Sieg [364th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L W W W L W
Form
W L L W L W L L W LHead To Head: Fourlis 1 - 0 Sieg
They have played 3 sets in total, with Fourlis winning 2 and Sieg winning 1. The last match between Fourlis and Sieg was at the W50 Austin, 12-11-2024, First, Hard with Jaimee Fourlis getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jaimee Fourlis | 1 |
| Madison Sieg | 0 |
| Fourlis | Stats | Sieg |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (4-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 42% (8-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 319 | Ranking | 364 |
| 147 | Highest Rank | 294 |
| 25 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 2 |
| 57% (232-172) | Career Total W/L | 54% (105-90) |
| $275,258 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Madison Sieg
66%
(
73 of
111)
1st Serve %
75%
(
83 of
111)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
50 of
83)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
48 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
111)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 3:3:0 | Average Match Time | 3:3:0 |
| 66% (73/111) | 1st Serve % | 75% (83/111) |
| 60% (44/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (50/83) |
| 50% (19/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (8/28) |
| 32% (6/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 48% (53/111) | Return Points Win % | 43% (48/111) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jaimee Fourlis vs Madison Sieg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fourlis 1 - 0 Sieg
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fourlis has won 38.61% of points on their second serve, while Sieg has won 42.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fourlis, in recent form, has won 53.85% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sieg has won 50.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.45% and 35.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fourlis has saved 48.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sieg has saved 52.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fourlis has won 57.69% of matches played (W/L 30/ 22), with Sieg winning 49.18% (W/L 30/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fourlis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 17/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Sieg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 11/ 9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 60/ 52).
- Player level: In the last year, Fourlis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 30/ 20), where as Sieg has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.18% of matches (W/L 30/ 31). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fourlis winning 1 times and Sieg being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Fourlis winning 2 and Sieg winning 1. The last match between Fourlis and Sieg was at the W50 Austin, 12-11-2024, First, Hard with Jaimee Fourlis getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fourlis and Sieg have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fourlis winning 1 times and Sieg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fourlis winning 0, and Sieg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fourlis has played against opponents with an average rank of 395.87 while Sieg has played against players with an average rank of 399.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fourlis has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sieg has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fourlis has converted 45.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sieg has converted 39.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jaimee Fourlis vs Madison Sieg Best Odds For The Match
Jaimee Fourlis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Sarah Rokusek
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
105)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
53%
(
46 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
92
Total Points Won
100
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Lizette Cabrera
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Yufei Ren
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
89%
(
8 of
9)
49%
(
51 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
79%
(
99 of
126)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
44%
(
56 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
115
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hiromi Abe
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
36 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Shiho Akita
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
77%
(
57 of
74)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Madison Sieg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ayana Akli
Player
Madison Sieg
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Christina Mchale
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
60%
(
15 of
25)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
42%
(
13 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
31
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Madison Sieg
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
12
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Madison Sieg
48%
(
11 of
23)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
7 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
35
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Unknown Player
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Emma Lene
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
8
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Madison Sieg
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mary Stoiana
Player
Madison Sieg
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Alexis Nguyen
69%
(
75 of
108)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Fourlis vs Sieg?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Fourlis Vs Sieg is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (232/172) | Win/Loss | 54% (105/90) |
| 56% (528/414) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (227/214) |
| 53% (4535/4071) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2002/1968) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 459 | Aces Total | 228 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 927 | Total Double Faults | 677 |
| 1:42:48 | Average Match Time | 1:41:36 |
| 501.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 433 |
| 69% (18046/26037) | 1st Serve % | 63% (7513/12011) |
| 60% (10755/18046) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4455/7513) |
| 46% (3673/7990) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2022/4498) |
| 48% (1644/3456) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (765/1576) |
| 47% (12412/26606) | Return Points Win % | 46% (5667/12258) |
| 57% (226/398) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (102/190) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 63% (45/71) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (16/30) |
| 50% (70/140) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (34/52) |
| 86% (224/192) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (96/87) |
| 14% (224/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (96/9) |
| 22% (180/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (99/18) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
